Innovative pedagogical strategies design to improve learning in school environments with technological limitations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70577/0resnm19

Keywords:

Pedagogical Strategies, Active Learning, Digital Divide, Rural Education, Educational Innovation.

Abstract

Rural educational institutions in Ecuador face structural challenges that negatively condition their students' academic performance, including limited digital connectivity, lack of technological devices, and insufficient diversified teaching materials. The Unidad Educativa Provincia de Tungurahua, located in the El Paraíso Parish of Las Lajas Canton, El Oro province, represents a case study of this reality. With a total population of 41 students, the institution demands pedagogical responses that transcend technological dependency. The objective of this research was to design innovative pedagogical strategies adapted to technologically limited environments aimed at strengthening teaching-learning processes. A mixed approach with participatory action research design was adopted, integrating quantitative and qualitative techniques. Results showed that the implementation of active methodologies collaborative learning, project-based learning, and place-based pedagogy generated statistically significant improvements in academic performance and intrinsic motivation. It is concluded that pedagogical innovation does not exclusively require technological mediation, but rather a critical and contextualized reconfiguration of teaching practices capable of mobilizing community knowledge and available resources as authentic learning tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barona-Paucar, P., Espinoza-Freire, E., & Cañizares-Vasquez, J. (2022). Estrategias pedagógicas en contextos rurales ecuatorianos: entre la precariedad y la resiliencia docente. Revista Científica Dominio de las Ciencias, 8(1), 1124-1143. https://doi.org/10.23857/dc.v8i1.2567

Boss, S., & Larmer, J. (2018). Project based teaching: How to create rigorous and engaging learning experiences. ASCD.

Cáceres-Muñoz, J., Jiménez-Hernández, A. S., & Martín-Sánchez, M. (2020). Cierre de escuelas y desigualdad socioeducativa en tiempos de pandemia: una investigación exploratoria en clave internacional. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 9(3), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.3.011

Carbonell, J. (2015). Pedagogías del siglo XXI: Alternativas para la innovación educativa. Octaedro.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3.ª ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75-88.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2020). Deep learning: Engage the world, change the world. Corwin Press.

Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (2014). Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity. Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Lara Guerrero, Y. E., & Bosquez Barcenes, V. A. (2026). Realidad Aumentada para motivar el pensamiento crítico en el aprendizaje de Ciencias Naturales. MENTOR revista de investigación educativa y deportiva, 5(13), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.56200/mentor.v5i13.11547

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Lozada, C., & Betancourt, M. (2021). Prácticas pedagógicas de maestros rurales: reflexiones desde la investigación participativa en comunidades andinas. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 51(2), 75-102. https://doi.org/10.48102/rlee.2021.51.2.383

Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2022). Informe de rendición de cuentas: Educación en el Ecuador pospandemia. Ministerio de Educación.

Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning—A systematic review and revision of Kolb's model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064-1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279

Ortiz-Colón, A. M., Jordán, J., & Agredal, M. (2018). Gamificación en educación: una panorámica sobre el estado de la cuestión. Educação e Pesquisa, 44, e173773. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634201844173773

Rogoff, B. (2021). The cultural nature of human development (nueva edición revisada). Oxford University Press.

Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15(3), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995170

Semken, S., Ward, E. G., Moosavi, S., & Chinn, P. W. U. (2021). Place-based education in geoscience: Theory, research, practice, and assessment. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 542-562. https://doi.org/10.5408/16-208.1

Sunkel, G., & Ullmann, H. (2019). Las personas mayores en América Latina y el Caribe: datos e indicadores. CEPAL. [Referencia aplicada en el contexto de brechas estructurales].

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation.

Torres-Ortega, R., Garzón-Guerrero, J., & Rodríguez-Ramírez, H. (2023). Impacto del aprendizaje basado en proyectos en el rendimiento académico de estudiantes rurales: evidencias desde Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 87, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num87-14832

Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1

Visible Learning. (2023). Global research database: Effect sizes related to student achievement. Corwin Research.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Williamson, G., & Hidalgo, C. (2022). Educación rural en Chile y Latinoamérica: temas, problemas y agenda de investigación. Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo, 7, e14096. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e14096

Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326

Published

2026-03-02

How to Cite

Innovative pedagogical strategies design to improve learning in school environments with technological limitations. (2026). Innovación Integral, 3(1), 230-251. https://doi.org/10.70577/0resnm19

Similar Articles

1-10 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.